Summary

Portrait of John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens Bush v. Gore — Opinion - dissent of Stevens

Time will one day heal the wound to that confidence that will be inflicted by today's decision. One thing, however, is certain. Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year's Presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the Nation's confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens Bush v. Gore — Opinion - dissent of Stevens

When questions arise about the meaning of state laws, including election laws, it is our settled practice to accept the opinions of the highest courts of the States as providing the final answers. On rare occasions, however, either federal statutes or the Federal Constitution may require federal judicial intervention in state elections. This is not such an occasion.
The federal questions that ultimately emerged in this case are not substantial. Article II provides that " [e] ach State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors."
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature