Summary

Jack Maskell Legal Processes for Contesting the Results of a Presidential Election (2016)

As is the case in general with civil law suits under American jurisprudence, the burden of proof is upon the challenger, that is, the moving party, not only to prove all of the allegations and charges with specific, credible evidence, [10] but also—in the case of an election contest—to show that any fraud or irregularity proven was to such an extent that it would actually have changed the result of the election or rendered the actual outcome reasonably uncertain.
Source: Wikisource

Jack Maskell Legal Processes for Contesting the Results of a Presidential Election (2016)

An election contest, however, usually addresses allegations of fraud in voting, or mistake or irregularity in election administration, that has resulted in the wrong candidate having been found to have received the most votes in the election, or which has made the ascertainment of the winner “reasonably uncertain.” Courts have been historically cautious in interfering with and overturning the results of a popular election on the basis of allegations of fraud or election irregularities.
Source: Wikisource

Jack Maskell Legal Processes for Contesting the Results of a Presidential Election (2016)

The electoral count law provides that if a contest or challenge in a state to the election or appointment of presidential electors is resolved in that state by an established procedure before the sixth day prior to the meeting of the electors, that such determination shall be “conclusive” and shall “govern” when Congress counts the electoral votes as directed in the Twelfth Amendment.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature