Summary

Joseph McKenna Dunbar v. City of New York — Opinion of the Court

And so in the water charge in controversy it was imposed and made a lien on plaintiff's property by the charter of the city, and therefore the Supreme Court at the first instance and afterwards in Appellate Division, and we may assume by the Court of Appeals, decided that the consent of plaintiff could be implied, and any other conclusion would have been impossible. A city without water would be a desolate place and if plaintiff's property was in such situation it would partake of the desolation.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature