Summary

Joseph McKenna Pendleton v. United States — Opinion of the Court

The fact that the accused did not offer himself as a witness in his own favor has been used to his prejudice, in violation of his right to remain silent until his guilt be established by the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.
'3. The evidence does not show the guilt of accused of the crime imputed to him beyond a reasonable doubt.'
The argument to support the first assignment of error is not very tangible.
Source: Wikisource

Joseph McKenna Pendleton v. United States — Opinion of the Court

Upon the first consideration of the case in the supreme court, no assignment of error based on the point was made. It was raised for the first time in what is styled, 'Exception to the Judgment, and Motion for a New Trial,' in which he excepted to the judgment rendered by the supreme court, and prayed that it be set aside and a new trial granted him. The reasons given were as follows:
'1. The defendant has been compelled to testify against himself, in violation of art.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature