Lewis Franklin Powell, Jr.

“ I agree with the Court that there is no fundamental right—i. e., no substantive right under the Due Process Clause—such as that claimed by respondent Hardwick, and found to exist by the Court of Appeals. This is not to suggest, however, that respondent may not be protected by the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution. The Georgia statute at issue in this case, Ga. Code Ann. 16-6-2 (1984) , authorizes a court to imprison a person for up to 20 years for a single private, consensual act of sodomy. ”

“ In my view, a prison sentence for such conduct—certainly a sentence of long duration—would create a serious Eighth Amendment issue. Under the Georgia statute a single act of sodomy, even in the private setting of a home, is a felony comparable in terms of the possible sentence imposed to serious felonies such as aggravated battery, 16-5-24, first-degree arson, 16-7-60, and robbery, 16-8-40. [1]
In this case, however, respondent has not been tried, much less convicted and sentenced. [2] Moreover, respondent has not raised the Eighth Amendment issue below. ”

“ Ann. Code, Art. 27, 553-554 (1982) (10-year maximum) ; Mich. Comp. Laws 750.158 (1968) (15-year maximum) ; Minn. Stat. 609.293 (1984) (1-year maximum) ; Miss. Code Ann. 97-29-59 (1973) (10-year maximum) ; Mo. Rev. Stat. 566.090 (Supp. 1984) (1-year maximum) ; Mont. Code Ann. 45-5-505 (1985) (10-year maximum) ; Nev. ”