Louis Bernheimer

Summary

Louis Bernheimer The trial of Sacco and Vanzetti (1927)

Sacco and Vanzetti had been urged by their friends to dispose of their radical literature and thus eliminate the most damaging evidence in the deportation proceedings they feared. It was to carry out this advice that Vanzetti and his friends were trying to get Boda’s car from Johnson’s garage on May 5th. And we cannot avoid concluding that Sacco and Vanzetti’s actions after their arrest were dictated, not by fear of arrest for murder, but by fear of deportation, or worse, for radicalism.
We have seen the Commonwealth abandon its first line of attack.
Source: Gutenberg

Louis Bernheimer The trial of Sacco and Vanzetti (1927)

Many celebrated men at home and abroad have declared them to be innocent, their defense has fought a heroic fight, while the machinery of the law has steadily brought them closer to death day by day, until there now stands between them and execution in the week of July 10th of this year, one man, Governor Alvin T. Fuller of Massachusetts.
Widespread ignorance on the part of the general public of the actual testimony on which the conviction of Sacco and Vanzetti was secured has made it advisable that a brief summary of the testimony of outstanding importance at the trial should be made.
Source: Gutenberg

Louis Bernheimer The trial of Sacco and Vanzetti (1927)

On appeal, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, May 2, 1926, found “no error” in any of the rulings of Judge Thayer. The guilt or innocence of the defendants was not, however, in question before the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. That court could not inquire as a matter of independent judgment, whether the facts as set forth in the printed record of the trial [Pg 15] justified the verdict. What was reviewed was, in effect, the conduct of the trial judge, Thayer, which was found to have shown “no abuse of judicial discretion.”
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature