Summary

Louis Brandeis Snyder v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

Neither in the findings of the Board of Tax Appeals, nor in the facts upon which the case was submitted to it, is there any support for the controverted allegation in Snyder's petition that his market operations constituted a 'business regularly carried on for profit.' [1] It is true that a taxpayer may be engaged in more than one trade or business, as those terms are used in various provisions of the Revenue Acts
Source: Wikisource

Louis Brandeis Snyder v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

His suggestion that gross income from trading be computed by deducting purchase prices from sale prices during the year would offer a feasible substitute only if it could be assumed that the number of purchases and sales would be approximately equal each year and that any differences would be averaged out in the course of a number of years.
Source: Wikisource

Louis Brandeis Snyder v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

It is also true that the Department has ruled, and the Board has held, that a taxpayer who, for the purpose of making a livelihood, devotes the major portion of his time to speculating on the stock exchange may treat losses thus incurred as having been sustained in the course of a trade or business. [2] Snyder, however, did not allege or attempt to prove that he had devoted the major part, or any substantial part, of his business day to his stock transactions.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature