Reliance Electric Company v. Emerson Electric Company…
“ A person avoids liability if he does not meet the statutory definition of an 'insider,' or if he sells more than six months after purchase. Liability cannot be imposed simply because the investor structured his transaction with the intent of avoiding liability under § 16 (b) . The question is, rather, whether the method used to 'avoid' liability is one permitted by the statute.Among the 'objective standards' contained in § 16 (b) is the requirement that a 10% owner be such 'both at the time of the purchase and sale . ”
