Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar

Summary

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Johnson v. Christian — Opinion of the Court

Johnson of her brother's agency, owing to her imperfect conception as to what constitutes an agent, and to her vague recollection of her own acts, is contradicted by the facts of which she herself testifies, and by the account marked 'Exhibit B,' made out under her direction, in which the receipts of the payment by cotton of the appellees are set out, the last of which is the item of $1,035 cash for balance on demand against Stuart and Christian; thus recognizing the receipts of the cotton, and the validity of the preceding payments made to her brother, as her agent, and received by herself.
Source: Wikisource

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Johnson v. Christian — Opinion of the Court

It is said that, if appellees are obliged to resort to equity to quiet their title, Robinson, their vendor, whose failure to have their payments properly appropriated caused their lands to be sold under the deed of trust previously given by him, should have been made a party to the suit, and called upon to see that the land had been paid for
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature