Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar

Summary

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar United States v. Voorhees — Opinion of the Court

The fact that he did perform the service on a schedule of 43 hours, as a matter of private enterprise, for transporting express matter and passengers, as an accommodation to the people along the line, is not inconsistent with his sworn certificate 'that it will take fifty per cent. more men and horses to perform mail service * * * on a reduced schedule from sixty-two hours to forty-three hours in summer and fifty hours in winter.' He was at liberty at any time to abandon his 43-hour schedule, and adopt the 62-hour schedule named in his contract.
Source: Wikisource

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar United States v. Voorhees — Opinion of the Court

It is admitted that such was their character.' In another part of the opinion he said: 'It appears that the sums thus allowed and paid to the subcontractors for stock and carriers, which were never required and never employed, aggregated $59,592.98, constituting the principalitem in the amount claimd in this action.' The whole line of argument in the opinion, upon the facts there stated, is readily observed to be inapplicable to the facts alleged in the petition in this case.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature