Summary

Mahlon Pitney United States v. Wigger — Opinion of the Court

There is hereby established a district court for the district, which shall be a court of general jurisdiction in civil, criminal, equity, and admiralty canses; and three district judges shall be appointed for the district, who shall, during their terms of office, reside in the divisions of the district to which they may be respectively assigned by the President. . . .'
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105) .
Source: Wikisource

Mahlon Pitney United States v. Wigger — Opinion of the Court

The territory in question having been ceded to the United States by the Emperor of Russia by treaty of March 30, 1867 (15 Stat. at L. 539) , Congress in the following year extended to it certain of the laws of the United States, at the same time enacting that, until otherwise provided, violations of the act should be prosecuted in any district court of the United States in California or Oregon or in the district courts of Washington (act of July 27, 1868, 15 Stat. at L. 240, 241, chap. 273, § 7) .
Source: Wikisource

Mahlon Pitney United States v. Wigger — Opinion of the Court

He demurred upon the ground (among others) that more than one crime was charged. The demurrer was sustained by the district court upon this ground, and the case comes here under the criminal appeals act of March 2, 1907. (34 Stat. at L. 1246, chap. 2564. ) The other grounds of the demurrer need not be further noticed.
By § 43 of title II. of the act of Congress approved March 3, 1899 (Alaska Code of Criminal Procedure, 30 Stat. at L. 1253, 1290, chap. 429; Comp. Laws of Alaska § 2152) , it was declared that 'the indictment must charge but one crime, and in one form only
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature