Summary

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Kent v. Lake Superior Ship Canal Railway Iron Company…

If the trustee acts in good faith, whatever binds it in any legal proceedings it begins and carries on to enforce the trust, to which they are not actual parties, binds them. Kerrison v. Stewart, 93 U.S. 155, 160; Corcoran v. Canal Co., 94 U.S. 741, 745; Shaw v. Railroad Co., 100 U.S. 605, 611. Whatever forecloses the trustee, in the absence of fraud or bad faith, forecloses them.'
The paramount lien of the certificates was recognized by Birdseye in the bill exhibited by him, and his action, so far as appears, was within the discretion reposed in him by his deed.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Kent v. Lake Superior Ship Canal Railway Iron Company…

It appears that the canal company defaulted in the payment of interest due upon its several issues of bonds; that bills were filed to foreclose the trust-deeds securing them; that receiver's certificates were issued by order of court; that a decree was entered in all the causes heard as one cause; and that the property was advertised and sold under the decree.
The right to a decree and sale cannot be controverted, and at the sale any or all the bondholders had the right to buy.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Kent v. Lake Superior Ship Canal Railway Iron Company…

Neither Birdseye nor McCarter, the trustees under whose deeds the bonds were issued which Wells held, are charged with fraud or any conduct in bad faith, and neither is a party to this bill.
The matters alleged to be fraudulent are the steps taken to have the property foreclosed and the purchase thereon ensuing, and what is charged is that the holders of large amounts of the bonds and of all the receiver's certificates combined to bring about the foreclosure and to make the purchase.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature