Summary

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Linford v. Ellison — Opinion of the Court

The law must be reasonable and just, because the court will not presume that congress intended to authorize the legislature to make an unjust, an unreasonable, an unequal, or an oppressive law. The subjects to which the power of the territorial legislature extends are not specifically described, and their number is limited by the word 'rightful.' A law upon a subject not of that number would be held void.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Linford v. Ellison — Opinion of the Court

Ct. 114: 'The validity of a statute is not drawn in question every time rights claimed under such statute are controverted, nor is the validity of an authority, every time an act done by such authority is disputed. The validity of a statute or the validity of an authority is drawn in question when the existence, or constitutionality, or legality of such statute or authority is denied, and the denial forms the subject of direct inquiry.' In Railroad Co.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Linford v. Ellison — Opinion of the Court

By the sixth section of the act establishing a territorial government for Utah, it was enacted 'that the legislative power of said territory shall extend to all rightful subjects of legislation, consistent with the constitution of the United States and the provisions of this act; but no law shall be passed interfering with the primary disposal of the soil; no tax shall be imposed upon property of the United States
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature