Summary

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Lyng v. Michigan — Opinion of the Court

We have repeatedly held that no state has the right to lay a tax on interstate commerce in any form, whether by way of duties laid on the transportation of the subjects of that commerce, or on the receipts derived from that transportation, or on the occupation or business of carrying it on, for the reason that such taxation is a burden on that commerce, and amounts to a regulation of it, which belongs solely to congress.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Lyng v. Michigan — Opinion of the Court

The same rule that applies to the sugar of Louisiana, the cotton of South Carolina, the wines of California, the hops of Washington, the tobacco of Maryland and Connecticut, or the products, natural or manufactured, of any state, applies to all commodities in which a right of traffic exists, recognized by the laws of congress, the decisions of courts, and the usages of the commercial world.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature