Summary

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Weir v. Norman — Opinion of the Court

Nothing in this constitution shall be construed to prevent the general assembly from providing for taxation, based on income, licenses or franchises.'
'Thus it is manifest that what the constitution intended to be taxed was property,-all property; and, as to corporations, not only all tangible property, but that it intended to leave the legislature of the state free to tax the franchise of corporations if it so desired; that the property of a corporation should be taxed as the property of an individual.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Weir v. Norman — Opinion of the Court

And, considered as a property tax, as, in our opinion, the prescribed exaction must be held to be, we regard it as in harmony with the provisions of the constitution of the commonwealth of Kentucky. The property, tangible and intangible, owned by corporations, is subjected to like taxation, and so the tangible and intangible property of individuals associated together in companies
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature