Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

Summary

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.,  Honolulu Rapid Transit Land Company v…

“ It is contended that the charter, by fair implication, contracts against any other charges, especially in view of the ultimate division of the excess of income, after the payment of 8 per cent dividend. If the dividends do not exceed 8 per cent, the tax will fall wholly on the stockholders, contrary to the fair understanding of what the charter holds out. ”
Source: Wikisource

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.,  Honolulu Rapid Transit Land Company v…

“ The tax in question is a property tax, and the effect of the decision is to uphold a valuation of the whole property as a going concern, and as more than a mere congeries of items; or, in other words, an addition of half a million dollars to the appellant's valuation, for the franchise of the company. The appellant says that this was contrary to § 17 of its charter, construed in the light of the scheme disclosed. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature