“ Interpreting § 13 (b) (1) in disregard of reality only acts as an open invitation to evade the Act and to destroy the statutory rights of those trucking concern employees who now perform no activities which affect the safety of operations. All that the employer need do to withdraw the benefits of the Act from these employees is to send them occasionally to a terminal to pick up or deliver a piece of interstate freight. They then fall into the 'power' of the Interstate Commerce Commission and automatically lose their rights under the Fair Labor Standards Act. ”
Summary
“Morris v. McComb — Dissent”, is a work by . It explores elements such as employees, transportation and activities.
Quotes from Morris v. McComb — Dissent ()
“ They spend virtually all of their time in transportation activities which are an integral part of the production of goods for interstate commerce. Walling v. Comet Carriers, 2 Cir., 151 F.2d 107. The issue thus becomes one of determining whether these employees are plainly and unmistakably within the terms and spirit of the § 13 (b) (1) exemption, giving due regard to the rule that exemptions from the operation of humanitarian legislation are to be narrowly construed. ”
“ Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice DOUGLAS concur, dissenting.Apart from § 13 (b) (1) , it is clear that petitioner's truck drivers and mechanics are subject to the wage and hour provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act. ”
