Summary

Portrait of Harold Hitz Burton Harold Hitz Burton Boutell v. Walling — Opinion of the Court

Whatever may be the precise scope of the Commission's 'power to establish' hours of service, we hold that the Commission does not have that power over the men here concerned because the Commission's jurisdiction is limited to employees of 'carriers' and the record here shows that the men in question are employees of the Service Company, which is not a carrier, rather than of the Drive-Away Company, which is a carrier.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harold Hitz Burton Harold Hitz Burton Boutell v. Walling — Opinion of the Court

Where motor vehicle drivers or mechanics are employed by companies engaged in certain types of interstate transportation over which the Interstate Commerce Commission disclaims jurisdiction, they are held to be covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act. For example, if such employees are engaged in the transportation in interstate commerce of consumable goods, such as food, coal and ice, to railroads and docks for use in trains and steamships, jurisdiction over them is disclaimed by the Commission but is accepted by the Wage and Hour Division as covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature