Summary

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter V. Callus/Opinion of the Court…

The series of cases in which we have had to decide when employees are engaged in an 'occupation necessary to the product on' of goods for commerce has settled at least some matters. Merely because an occupation involves a function not indispensable to the production of goods, in the sense that it can be done without, does not exclude it from the scope of the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter V. Callus/Opinion of the Court…

To differentiate, in the incidence of the Fair Labor Standards Act, between maintenance employees who worked in the building where the business of the manufacture of milk products goes on and employees pursuing the same occupation for the Borden enterprise in an office separate from the manufacturing building, is to make too much turn on the accident of the division of the whole industrial process.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter V. Callus/Opinion of the Court…

The differences between employees of a building owned by occupants producing therein goods for commerce, and the employees of a building intended for tenants who produce such goods therein, and the employees of the office building of a large interstate producer, are too thin for the practicalities of adjudication. But an office building exclusively devoted to the purpose of housing all the usual miscellany of offices has many differences in the practical affairs of life from a manufacturing building, or the office building of a manufacturer.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature