Summary

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Mitchell v. H. B. Zachry Company…

Assuming arguendo that maintenance and repair of the completed dam would be covered employment, it does not follow that construction of the dam therefore is. The activities are undoubtedly equally 'directly essential' to the producers of goods who depend upon the water supply; but they are not equally remote from production or from the 'commerce' for which production is intended.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Mitchell v. H. B. Zachry Company…

Further removed from 'commerce' is employment not 'in' production 'for' commerce but in an activity which is only 'related' to such production. In applying this provision, we have necessarily borne in mind that it is furthest removed in the scheme of the statute from the hub of the national interest in 'commerce' upon which a limited displacement of state power is predicated.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature