Summary

Portrait of Morrison Waite Morrison Waite Railroad Company v. Loftin — Opinion of the Court

The capital stock of said company, with all the immunities and franchises herein specified, and all machinery, cars, engines, or carriages, belonging to said company, together with all their works and property, and all profits which shall arise from the same, shall be vested in the respective stockholders forever, in proportion to their respective shares
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Morrison Waite Morrison Waite Railroad Company v. Loftin — Opinion of the Court

Loftin (98 U.S. 559) , in passing upon a provision of the charter of the Mississippi Valley Railroad Company, substantially like the section here relied on, this court held that the exemption did not extend to lands granted by the State to the company to aid in the construction of its railroad. Such lands, it was then said, were used in lieu of capital, and to the extent they could be made available relieved the company from the necessity of raising money through stock subscriptions. Like the court below, we are unable to distinguish the case made by this complaint from that.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Morrison Waite Morrison Waite Railroad Company v. Loftin — Opinion of the Court

All such exemptions are to be construed strictly. Every doubt is to be resolved in favor of the power to tax. Under such circumstances, if the question were an open one, we should have little difficulty in reaching the same conclusion as the courts of the State have done. Manifestly, therefore, we are not now called upon to overrule what has been settled for nearly a quarter of a century.
It is expressly stated in the complaint that the lands held by the company were sold by the State more than ten years before this suit was begun.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature