Summary

Nathan Clifford Sturges v. The Collector — Opinion of the Court

Congress desired to raise more revenue from importations consisting of articles grown or produced in countries east of the Cape of Good Hope, and at the same time to preserve and continue the discrimination established by existing laws in favor of importations made directly from the countries where the articles imported were grown or produced.
Source: Wikisource

Nathan Clifford Sturges v. The Collector — Opinion of the Court

Moneys paid for import duties, when illegally levied, may be recovered back by the owner, importer, or consignee in an action of assumpsit against the collector by whom the same were exacted, if the payment was made under written protest, as required by law, and the party making the payment failed to obtain redress by appeal seasonably taken to the Secretary of the Treasury.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature