Summary

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Barnet v. National Bank — Opinion of the Court

An issue ought not to be tried where it would be a sheer mistrial and a mere waste of time. The court ought sua sponte to strike it out of disregard it. If a frivolous issue is left in the record, it does not therefore follow that it is to be seriously treated.
In the first defence, the payment of the usurious interest is distinctly averred, and it is sought to apply it by way of offset or payment to the bill of exchange in suit.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Barnet v. National Bank — Opinion of the Court

The bank demurred to the several defences set up by the assignees. To the first and third the demurrer was sustained, and overruled as to the second. Upon the latter the plaintiff took issue, and the case was tried by a jury. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the bank for $4,080.31, and judgment was given accordingly. It does not appear that any thing done by the court touching this trial was objected to by the plaintiffs in error. There is no bill of exceptions in the record.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature