Summary

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Kennedy v. Gibson — Opinion of the Court

If too much be collected, it is provided by the statute, that any surplus which may remain after satisfying all demands against the association, shall be paid over to the stockholders. It is better they should pay more than may prove to be needed than that the evils of delay should be encountered. When contribution only is sought, all the stockholders who can be reached by the process of the court may be joined in the suit.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Kennedy v. Gibson — Opinion of the Court

It is no objection that there are others beyond the jurisdiction of the court who cannot for that reason be made codefendants.
The claims of creditors may be proved before the comptroller, or established by suit against the association. Creditors must seek their remedy through the comptroller in the mode prescribed by the statute; they cannot proceed directly in their own names against the stockholders or debtors of the bank. The receiver is the statutory assignee of the association, and is the proper party to institute all suits
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature