Summary

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Same v. Same (76 U.S. 805)/Opinion of the Court…

The appellants are estopped from denying knowledge of its contents. They were sufficient to show the existence of the assignment to Judson and Dorr, and the general scope and character of its contents. If not satisfied with the views of Mr. Justice Grier upon the subject they should have made the defence by plea or answer. Not having spoken at the proper time in that way, they cannot be permitted to speak with effect now, in this way. They have slept upon knowledge which, if material, should have awakened them to activity more than seven years ago. Their laches is fatal to their application.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Same v. Same (76 U.S. 805)/Opinion of the Court…

The requisite leave is never a matter of right. [2] The affidavits have failed to satisfy us, that if a bill of review were filed the result would affect the decree which has been rendered.
We are all of the opinion, that under the circumstances it would not be proper to withhold longer from the appellees the fruits of the relief to which we have found them entitled. It is not probable that the appellants will be injured by any litigation which the representatives of Judson or Dorr may institute.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature