Summary

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Schuchardt v. Allens — Opinion of the Court

From these facts we think the jury were well warranted in drawing the inference that it was the understanding of the vendees that they were buying under a warranty that the quality of the madder in the casks was equal to that of the sample in the bottle, and that the agent of the vendors intended to be understood as giving such a warranty. It is hardly credible in the presence of such facts that the understanding and intention of the parties could have been otherwise.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Schuchardt v. Allens — Opinion of the Court

Where the evidence, or only part of it, if believed by the jury, is decisive of the case, it is proper for the court to instruct the jury to that effect. [9]
In order to determine whether the court erred in refusing to give the fourth and fifth instructions, it will therefore be necessary to consider the state of the evidence before the jury.
At the time of the sale the agent produced a sample bottle. There was but one for the one hundred casks of madder. It was usual to have one for each cask.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature