Summary

Portrait of Joseph Story Joseph Story Chirac v. Reinecker — Opinion of the Court

If the court had been asked to instruct the jury that the evidence of the plaintiffs, if believed by the jury, was competent in point of law, from which they might infer all the necessary facts to maintain the action, unless it was rebutted on the part of the defendant, it would have been unobjectionable.It would have left the matters of fact for the just consideration of the jury, upon the prima facie evidence of the plaintiffs.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Joseph Story Joseph Story Chirac v. Reinecker — Opinion of the Court

In the opinion of the Court upon this point, it was stated that, in general, a recovery in ejectment, like other judgments, binds only parties and privies. It is conclusive evidence in an action for mesne profits against the tenant in possession, or other defendant on record. But in relation to third persons the judgment is not conclusive; and if they are sued in an action for mesne profits, they may controvert the plaintiff's title at large.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Joseph Story Joseph Story Chirac v. Reinecker — Opinion of the Court

In such a suit (that is to say, against third persons) the record of the ejectment is not evidence to establish the plaintiff's title, but is admissible to show the possession of the plaintiff. This proposition has been supposed at the bar to indicate an opinion that in the case then before the Court, with reference to all the circumstances of notice, and rating of the rents, &c. by Reinecker, the record was only evidence of the possession and not of the title of the plaintiffs.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature