Summary

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Van Stone v. Stillwell Bierce Manufacturing Company…

It requires nothing more than a mere statement to show that the first error assigned is without foundation. Under the pleadings as framed and the issues thus made up, it was not only not error for the court to admit evidence in the case, but it would have been a grave error to have refused to allow the admission of evidence. Moreover, the record fails to show that any objection of any kind or character was made by plaintiff in error to the introduction of evidence.
Source: Wikisource

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Van Stone v. Stillwell Bierce Manufacturing Company…

It is manifest that the motion in arrest of judgment can be sustained only upon the theory that the court was without any authority to enter up a judgment recognizing and enforcing a mechanic's lien upon the property, since that would be the only defect upon the face of this record which we could consider upon such a motion.
Source: Wikisource

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Van Stone v. Stillwell Bierce Manufacturing Company…

When a party wishes to withdraw from the jury the application of the law to the facts, he may, by consent of the court, demur in law upon the evidence, the effect of which is to take from the jury and refer to the court the application of the law to the facts, and thus the evidence is made a part of the record, and is considered by the court as in the case of a special verdict.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature