Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

Summary

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Abilene National Bank of Abilene v…

Allegations in the bill as to the purpose and intent of the statute, of course, are immaterial. They introduce no new facts, and leave the question as it would be without them; namely, whether anything can be discerned in the terms or effect of the act that infringes the plaintiffs' constitutional rights. A good deal of the argument seems to be that the statute will make state banks so attractive to the public that the national banks will suffer.
Source: Wikisource

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Abilene National Bank of Abilene v…

But even if it had, there is nothing to hinder the states from permitting a competing business and doing what Kansas has done with intent to make it popular and safe. The national banks are free to come into the scheme. The suggestion that they could not come in and remain national banks is simply a statement of the situation of all competitors.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature