Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

Summary

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Bi-Metallic Investment Company v…

For the purposes of decision we assume that the constitutional question is presented in the baldest way,-that neither the plaintiff nor the assessor of Denver, who presents a brief on the plaintiff's side, nor any representative of the city and county, was given an opportunity to be heard, other than such as they may have had by reason of the fact that the time of meeting of the boards is fixed by law. On this assumption it is obvious that injustice may be suffered if some property in the county already has been valued at its full worth.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature