Summary

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Bourjois Company v. Katzel — Opinion of the Court

Ownership of the goods does not carry the right to sell them with a specific mark. It does not necessarily carry the right to sell them at all in a given place. If the goods were patented in the United States a dealer who lawfully bought similar goods abroad from one who had a right to make and sell them there could not sell them in the United States.
Source: Wikisource

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Bourjois Company v. Katzel — Opinion of the Court

If for the purpose of evading the effect of the transfer it had arranged with the defendant that she should sell with the old label, we suppose that no one would doubt that the contrivance must fail. There is no such conspiracy here, but apart from the opening of a door to one, the vendors could not convey their goods free from the restriction to which the vendors were subject.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature