Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

Summary

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Eaton v. Brown — Opinion of the Court

Bearing these opposing considerations in mind, the court is of opinion that the will should be admitted to proof.
'Courts do not incline to regard a will as conditional where it can be reasonably held that the testator was merely expressing his inducement to make it, however inaccurate his use of language might be, if strictly construed.' Damon v. Damon, 8 Allen, 192, 197. Lord Penzance puts the same proposition perhaps even more strongly in Porter's Goods, L. R. 2 Prob. & Div. 22, 23; and it is almost a commonplace. In the case at bar we have an illiterate woman writing her own will.
Source: Wikisource

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Eaton v. Brown — Opinion of the Court

The English courts are especially and wisely careful not to substitute a lively imagination of what a testatrix would have said if her attention had been directed to a particular point for what she has said in fact. On the other hand, to a certain extent, not to be exactly defined, but depending on judgment and tact, the primary import of isolated words may be held to be modified and controlled by the dominant intention, to be gathered from the instrument as a whole.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature