Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

Summary

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. In re Moran — Opinion of the Court

The order of the supreme court was as precise as the circumstances permitted it to be, and the failure to specify a building did not go to the jurisdiction of the trial court. There is no pretense that the petitioner lost any opportunities by reason of no building being named.
The next ground argued is that the laws of the territory were not followed in the selection of the grand jury, because the persons selected were not elecors of the territory, and some of them were nonresidents, with other subordinate matters.
Source: Wikisource

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. In re Moran — Opinion of the Court

If the legislature of Oklahoma had prescribed the method of selection followed, that method would not have violated the Constitution or any law or treaty of the United States. If it did prescribe a different one, a departure from that was a violation of the territorial enactment alone. The acts of the legislature of Oklahoma are not laws of the United States within the meaning of Rev.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature