Summary

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Jackman v. Rosenbaum Company — Opinion of the Court

At the trial the plaintiff asked for a ruling that the statute relating to party walls, if inter preted to exclude the recovery of damages without proof of negligence, was contrary to the Fourteenth Amendment. This was refused, the Court ruling that the defendant was not liable for damages necessarily resulting from the exercise of the right given by the statute to build a party wall upon the line, and, more specifically, was not liable for the removal of the plaintiff's old wall.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature