Summary

Portrait of Sherman Minton Sherman Minton Stembridge v. Georgia — Opinion of the Court

The amending order of the Georgia Court of Appeals does not, in our view, change the posture of this case-it does not remove the strong possibility, in light of Georgia law, that the Supreme Court of Georgia might have rested its order on a nonfederal ground. We are without jurisdiction when the question of the existence of an adequate state ground is debatable.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Sherman Minton Sherman Minton Stembridge v. Georgia — Opinion of the Court

Petitioner was convicted of voluntary manslaughter for the fatal shooting of an eighteen-year-old woman in an altercation growing out of a business transaction. A second woman was wounded in the affray. At his trial, petitioner claimed that he killed the deceased in self-defense. The jury obviously did not believe him or it would not have found him guilty of voluntary manslaughter. He appealed to the Court of Appeals of Georgia which affirmed the conviction on July 12, 1950. Stembridge v. State, 82 Ga.App. 214, 60 S.E.2d 491. Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia was denied.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Sherman Minton Sherman Minton Stembridge v. Georgia — Opinion of the Court

The decision of this Court on the rehearing in question being adverse to the plaintiff in error necessarily brought into consideration the question of whether the rights of the plaintiff in error as guaranteed to him under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States had been violated, and such decision necessarily determined that such rights had not been so violated.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature