Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

Summary

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Sage v. Hampe — Opinion of the Court

It appears to us that this is a contract of that class. It called for an act that could not be done at the time, and it tended to lead the defendant to induce the Indian owner to attempt what the law, for his own good, forbade. Such contracts, if upheld, might be made by parties nearly connected with the Indian, and strongly tend by indirection to induce him to deprive himself of rights that the laws seeks to protect.
Source: Wikisource

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Sage v. Hampe — Opinion of the Court

The purpose of the law still is to protect the Indian interest, and a contract that tends to bring to bear improper influence upon the Secretary of the Interior, and to induce attempts to mislead him as to what the welfare of the Indian requires, are as contrary to the policy of the law as others that have been condemned by the courts.
Source: Wikisource

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Sage v. Hampe — Opinion of the Court

There can be no question that the United States can make its prohibitions binding upon others than Indians to the extent necessary effectively to carry its policy out, and therefore, as on the grounds that we have indicated, the contract contravenes the policy of the law, there is no reason why the law should not be read, if necessary, as broad enough to embrace it in terms.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature