Summary

Owen J. Roberts United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Company…

In the absence of the evidence before the Commission, we cannot say that there was no adequate and sufficient proof on which to base a finding of the reasonableness of the rates prescribed. [1] It is true that in both reports touching the rates here in controversy the Commission used as comparatives rates from the midcontinent field to South Dakota points and those from Wyoming origins to South Dakota and North Dakota destinations. But it appears from the reports that the carriers themselves presented comparisons of these very rates in support of their contentions.
Source: Wikisource

Owen J. Roberts United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Company…

Between January 15, 1930, and February 3, 1932, no application based on changed economic conditions was made to the Commission, and that body was allowed to consider the record and prepare a report without notice of any claim in that behalf.
The Commission is not bound to allow existing unreasonable rates to stand solely because revision will in some degree adversely affect carriers suffering from economic depression.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature