Summary

Peter Vivian Daniel White v. Nicholls — Opinion of the Court

And when any man shall consent to be a candidate for a public office conferred by the election of the people, he must be considered as putting his character in issue, so far as it may respect his fitness and qualifications for the office; and publications of the truth on the subject, with the honest intention of informing the people, are not a libel; for it would be unreasonable to conclude, that the publication of truths, which it is the interest of the people to know, should be an offence against their laws.
Source: Wikisource

Peter Vivian Daniel White v. Nicholls — Opinion of the Court

Highly, 3 Bing., N. C., 690, it is said 'to be an established principle upon which the privilege of publishing the report of any judicial proceeding is admitted to rest, that such report must be strictly confined to the actual proceedings in court, and must contain no defamatory observations or comments from any quarter whatsoever in addition to what forms strictly and properly the legal proceedings.' So a publication of the result of the evidence is not privileged; the evidence itself must be published. Neither is a publication of a counsel's speech unaccompanied by the evidence.
Source: Wikisource

Peter Vivian Daniel White v. Nicholls — Opinion of the Court

How far, under an alleged right to examine into the fitness and qualifications of men who are either in office or are applicants for office-or, how far, under the obligation of a supposed duty to arraign such men either at the bar of their immediate superiors or that of public opinion, their reputation, their acts, their motives or feelings may be assailed with impunity-how far that law, designed for the protection of all, has placed a certain class of citizens without the pale of its protection?
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature