Summary

Peter Vivian Daniel Williams v. Gibbes (58 U.S. 239…

The absence of the personal representatives of the insolvent assignors is the only circumstance imparting a shade or semblance of difference between the attitude of these cases as formerly brought before us, and that in which they are now presented. Of what importance, either now or formerly, could be the presence or absence of the personal representatives of these insolvents, it might puzzle OEdipus himself to divine. The rights or interests of the representative can never be broader than are those of the person represented
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature