Summary

Portrait of Philip Schaff Philip Schaff Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. VII — Introductory Notice (1885)

This is the fact which gives importance to the earliest dogmatic testimony proceeding from the See of Rome. [3] Dionysius has the great distinction of sustaining the orthodoxy which Hippolytus and other comprovincial bishops had established against the heresy of two of his predecessors; and this little essay, embedded in the works of Athanasius, comes forth as a genuine “bee” out of his precious amber, sweet with the honey of truth, and pungent with the sting of an acute and piercing testimony against error.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Philip Schaff Philip Schaff Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. VII — Introductory Notice (1885)

Dionysius is no exception to the rule that Latin Christianity had no place in Rome till after the Nicene Council. He was a Greek by birth, and reflects the spirit and orthodoxy of the Greek Fathers; and what we have from him is written in the Greek language. We find it in Athanasius, where, remarks Waterland, [1] its genuineness cannot be suspected, because “Athanasius did not entirely approve of it, and would certainly never have forged an interpretation different from his own.”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Philip Schaff Philip Schaff Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. VII — Introductory Notice (1885)

I considered it judicious to elucidate Dionysius by the doctrines of Athanasius, to whom we owe the preservation of the fragment itself; and (6) I felt that here was the place to record the “Athanasian Confession” (so called) , which, apocryphal though it be, as a “creed” under his name is allowed to embody the principles for which the whole life of Athanasius was a contest unparalleled in the history of Christianity.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature