Summary

Pierce Butler Rockford Life Insurance Company v…

In reason the cost of depreciation, like other items of expense to be deducted, ought to be limited to that related to the income taxed. Allowance of deduction of expenses incurred for the correction of premiums or in respect of other income not taxed would be hard to justify. In absence of specific declaration of that purpose, Congress may not reasonably be held to have intended by that means further to reduce taxable income of life insurance companies.
Source: Wikisource

Pierce Butler Rockford Life Insurance Company v…

Section 203 (a) (5) , by restricting deductions to investment expenses, indicates purpose to exclude those not related to investment income. Section 203 (b) , by condition imposed, similarly restricts deductions of real estate expenses. The language under consideration opposes deduction of unrelated expenses and is in harmony with the construction for which the commissioner contends. The significance of the word 'reasonable' qualifying allowance need not be limited to the amount to be ascertained.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature