Summary

Richard John Santorum 152 Cong. Rec. S5527 - Marriage Protection Amendment - Motion to Proceed… (2006)

Could a religious summer camp operated in strict conformity with religious principles refuse to accept children coming from same-sex marriages? What of a church-affiliated community center, with a gym and a Little League, that offers family programs? Must a religious-affiliated family services provider offer marriage counseling to same-sex couples designed to facilitate or preserve their relationships?
Source: Wikisource

Richard John Santorum 152 Cong. Rec. S5527 - Marriage Protection Amendment - Motion to Proceed… (2006)

Doug Kmiec of Pepperdine law school argued that the public could tell the difference between racial discrimination and the differentiation of traditional and same-sex marriage, saying that racial discrimination is ‘‘irrational, and morally repugnant’’ and the issue of same-sex marriage is ‘‘at least morally debatable.’’ Doug Laycock, a religious liberty expert at the University of Texas law school, noted that the legal situation is a long way away from equating sexual orientation with race in the law.
Source: Wikisource

Richard John Santorum 152 Cong. Rec. S5527 - Marriage Protection Amendment - Motion to Proceed… (2006)

Is the fate of Catholic Charities of Boston an aberration or a sign of things to come? Some say we are overreacting, but the truth is that while the ramifications in the battle for social policy, procreation, and even protecting children may be clear, the real—but hidden—battlelines are for the religious liberty of all faiths. Recently the Becket Fund convened a group of scholars to discuss the implications of same-sex marriage on religious liberty.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature