Summary

Robert H. Jackson United States v. Wunderlich — Dissent

I think that we should adhere to the rule that where the decision of the contracting officer or department head shows 'such gross mistake as necessarily to imply bad faith' there is a judicial remedy even if it has its origin in overzeal for the department, negligence of the deciding official, misrepresentations-however innocent-by subordinates, prejudice against the contractor, or other causes that fall short of actual corruption. Men are more often bribed by their loyalties and ambitions than by money.
Source: Wikisource

Robert H. Jackson United States v. Wunderlich — Dissent

He is not at liberty to make arbitrary or reckless use of his power, nor to disregard evidence, nor to shield his department from consequences of its own blunders at the expense of contractors. He is somewhat in the position of the lawyer dealing with his client or the doctor with his patient, for the superiority of his position imposes restraints appropriate to the trust. Though the contractor may have convenanted to be satisfied with what his adversay renders to him, it must be true that he who bargains to be made judge of his own cause assumes an implied obligation to do justice.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature