Robert Stawell Ball

Robert Stawell Ball

Summary

Portrait of Robert Stawell Ball Robert Stawell Ball 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1911)

It would take 20 tons of coal a day burned on each square foot of the sun’s surface to supply the daily radiation. Even if the sun were made of one mass of fuel as efficient as coal, that mass must be entirely expended in a few thousand years if the present rate of radiation was to be sustained. We cannot, therefore, admit that the source of the heat in the sun is to be found in any chemical combination taking place in its mass.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Robert Stawell Ball Robert Stawell Ball 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1911)

At the present time we can only say that the nebular hypothesis is indicated by the general tendencies of the laws of nature, that it has not been proved to be inconsistent with any fact, that it is almost a necessary consequence of the only theory by which we can account for the origin and conservation of the sun’s heat, but that it rests on the assumption that this conservation is to be explained by the laws of nature as we now see them in operation.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Robert Stawell Ball Robert Stawell Ball 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1911)

The truth about the sun’s heat appears to be that the sun is really an incandescent body losing heat, but that the operation of cooling is immensely retarded owing to a curious circumstance due jointly to the enormous mass of the sun and to a remarkable law of heat. It is well known that if energy disappears in one form it reappears in another, and this principle applied to the sun will explain the famous difficulty.
As the sun loses heat it contracts, and every pair of particles in the sun are nearer to each other after the contraction than they were before.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature