Summary

Portrait of Roger B. Taney Roger B. Taney Callan v. May — Opinion of the Court

And when May had become the purchaser, and the sale was ratified by the Court, and he had complied with the conditions of the sale, he was entitled, as a matter of course, to the process of the Court to put him in possession, The order of the Court directing process to issue is not such a final order or decree in a case as the Act of 1789 contemplates. It is nothing more than an order of process to carry into execution a final decree already passed in a case in which May was not a party.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Roger B. Taney Roger B. Taney Callan v. May — Opinion of the Court

He may, and no doubt often does, entertain doubts upon the subject, or may regard the point as new and undecided, and upon which different opinions may be entertained, and in such cases he grants the appeal in order to bring the matter before the Court and enable it to decide for itself whether the case is or is not within their appellate jurisdiction as regulated by the Act of Congress.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature