Summary

Portrait of Roger B. Taney Roger B. Taney Kelsey v. Forsyth — Opinion of the Court

It is sufficient to say that the agreement of parties cannot authorize this court to revise a judgment of an inferior court in any other mode of proceeding than that which the law prescribes, nor can the laws of a State, regulating the proceedings of its own courts, authorize a district or Circuit Court sitting in the State to depart from the modes of proceeding and rules prescribed by the acts of Congress.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Roger B. Taney Roger B. Taney Kelsey v. Forsyth — Opinion of the Court

An action of ejectment was brought by the defendants in error against the plaintiff, for a certain parcel of land described in the declaration, and upon the trial the verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff; a motion was afterwards made to set aside the judgment and for a new trial, and the judgment was accordingly set aside, and a new trial granted upon the terms mentioned in the transcript. In the proceedings upon this new trial, the parties agreed to waive a trial by jury, and that both matters of law and of fact should be submitted to the decision of the court.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature