Summary

Portrait of Roger B. Taney Roger B. Taney Shields v. Thomas (58 U.S. 3)…

And although the crew are allowed by law, (for the sake of convenience and to save costs,) to join in a suit for wages, yet the right of each seaman is separate and distinct from his associates. His contract is separate; and his recovery does not depend upon the recovery of others, but rests altogether on its own evidence and merits.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Roger B. Taney Roger B. Taney Shields v. Thomas (58 U.S. 3)…

It is like a contract with several to pay a sum of money. It may be that the money, when recovered, is to be divided between them in equal or unequal proportions. Yet, if a controversy arises on the contract, and the sum in dispute upon it exceeds two thousand dollars, an appeal would clearly lie to this court, although the interest of each individual was less than that sum.
This being the controversy in Kentucky, the decree of that court, apportioning the sum recovered among the several representatives, does not alter its character when renewed in Iowa.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature