Summary

Portrait of Roger B. Taney Roger B. Taney West v. Brashear (39 U.S. 51)…

And believing from the testimony, that it was lost by the negligence and misconduct of these creditors, and the subsequent insolvency of Latimer, they directed Brashear to be credited with the whole amount thus shipped. The intention of the Court, therefore, as gathered from the opinion, is in unison with the direction contained in the mandate; and, in our judgment, the Circuit Court have rightly expounded it. The decree of the Court below is affirmed.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Roger B. Taney Roger B. Taney West v. Brashear (39 U.S. 51)…

Francis West was a creditor of Brashear's, and, together with other creditors, laid attachments on his property and credits, in the hands of Latimer; and these were a part of the matters in controversy in the former suit. The mandate of this Court will be found in page 624 of the report above mentioned, and the controversy in this case turns upon the construction of that mandate.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature