Summary

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Clark v. United States (95 U.S. 539…

Sudden occasions for supplies, for the occupation of buildings, for the transportation of food and munitions of war, are constantly arising, and in many of them it is impossible to do more than demand what is wanted, and agree to pay what it is worth. Did Congress intend to say that the patriotic citizen, who said 'take of mine what is necessary,' is to lose his property for want of a written contract, or be remitted to the delays of an act of Congress?
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature