Summary

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Hess v. Reynolds — Opinion of the Court

Nor is it denied that such courts as are usually called probate courts are rightfully vested in a general way with authority to supervise the collection of these debts and other assets, the payment of the debts of the decedent, and to make distribution of the remainder. But the estate of a decedent is neither a person nor a corporation.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Hess v. Reynolds — Opinion of the Court

The controverted question of debt or no debt is one which, if the representative of the decedent is a citizen of a state different from that of the other party, the party properly situated has a right, given by the constitution of the United States, to have tried originally or by removal in a court of the United States, which cannot be defeated by state statutes enacted for the more convenient settlement of estates of decedents.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature